<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The value of good scrutiny</title>
	<atom:link href="http://highbarnet.org/2009/03/11/the-value-of-good-scrutiny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://highbarnet.org/2009/03/11/the-value-of-good-scrutiny/</link>
	<description>News from High Barnet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:46:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rog T</title>
		<link>http://highbarnet.org/2009/03/11/the-value-of-good-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Rog T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highbarnet.org/2009/03/11/the-value-of-good-scrutiny/#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Do Call Me Dave&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If you read Ducan&#039;s post or Mike Freer&#039;s press release it would be rather clear. If the leader had followed their advice in October, then we&#039;d have had 5 months where our cash would have been safer.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Amanda,&lt;br/&gt;Seems to me that Duncan &amp; the other committee members did exactly what they were supposed to. It&#039;s a shame that the Cabinet of Barnet didn&#039;t when they had the opportunity. Strange how you two post comments within 2 mins of each other. Maybe Duncan should give your IP addresses some scrutiny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do Call Me Dave</p>
<p>If you read Ducan&#39;s post or Mike Freer&#39;s press release it would be rather clear. If the leader had followed their advice in October, then we&#39;d have had 5 months where our cash would have been safer.</p>
<p>Amanda,<br />Seems to me that Duncan &amp; the other committee members did exactly what they were supposed to. It&#39;s a shame that the Cabinet of Barnet didn&#39;t when they had the opportunity. Strange how you two post comments within 2 mins of each other. Maybe Duncan should give your IP addresses some scrutiny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: do call me dave</title>
		<link>http://highbarnet.org/2009/03/11/the-value-of-good-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>do call me dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highbarnet.org/2009/03/11/the-value-of-good-scrutiny/#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Can I ask exactly WhAT the Lib Dems have done for the residents of Barnet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I ask exactly WhAT the Lib Dems have done for the residents of Barnet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://highbarnet.org/2009/03/11/the-value-of-good-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highbarnet.org/2009/03/11/the-value-of-good-scrutiny/#comment-208</guid>
		<description>All very well and good Cllr for you to sit on your fence and criticise instead of actually bothering to offer your help and assistance and maybe a little advice.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But then thats a very typical Lib Dem response isn&#039;t it?  Never to be trusted after their own manual only a short time ago told their very own activists to act wicked and shameless to get any vote they can!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All very well and good Cllr for you to sit on your fence and criticise instead of actually bothering to offer your help and assistance and maybe a little advice.</p>
<p>But then thats a very typical Lib Dem response isn&#8217;t it?  Never to be trusted after their own manual only a short time ago told their very own activists to act wicked and shameless to get any vote they can!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rog T</title>
		<link>http://highbarnet.org/2009/03/11/the-value-of-good-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Rog T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 07:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highbarnet.org/2009/03/11/the-value-of-good-scrutiny/#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Duncan&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think that everyone in Barnet owes the committee a big thank you. Also thanks for the blog. It&#039;s a shame that the leaders official tax funded blog doesn&#039;t tell us this.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Well done guys !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan</p>
<p>I think that everyone in Barnet owes the committee a big thank you. Also thanks for the blog. It&#8217;s a shame that the leaders official tax funded blog doesn&#8217;t tell us this.</p>
<p>Well done guys !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don't Call Me Dave</title>
		<link>http://highbarnet.org/2009/03/11/the-value-of-good-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Don't Call Me Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highbarnet.org/2009/03/11/the-value-of-good-scrutiny/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>89% represents a systemic failure rather than an accidental mistake. One officer has resigned but it would be stretching credulity to say that this whole crisis was caused my a middle ranking officer acting alone.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Others must have know what was going on. More heads need to roll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>89% represents a systemic failure rather than an accidental mistake. One officer has resigned but it would be stretching credulity to say that this whole crisis was caused my a middle ranking officer acting alone.</p>
<p>Others must have know what was going on. More heads need to roll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

