Comments on: The value of good scrutiny – part 2 http://highbarnet.org/2009/03/13/the-value-of-good-scrutiny-part-2/ News from High Barnet Liberal Democrats Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:21:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Don't Call Me Dave http://highbarnet.org/2009/03/13/the-value-of-good-scrutiny-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-211 Don't Call Me Dave Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:29:00 +0000 http://highbarnet.org/2009/03/13/the-value-of-good-scrutiny-part-2/#comment-211 Mike Freer says he asked Officers if investments were in line with policy. When did he ask that? Was it only <b><i>after</i></b> Iceland went down?<br/><br/>Did he ever ask any such questions previously?<br/><br/>It seems to me there is an overriding public interest for the confidential report to be released into the public domain. On what grounds can it remain exempt? Mike Freer says he asked Officers if investments were in line with policy. When did he ask that? Was it only after Iceland went down?

Did he ever ask any such questions previously?

It seems to me there is an overriding public interest for the confidential report to be released into the public domain. On what grounds can it remain exempt?

]]>